Integrity

M both leaders throughout history suck set heights ethic and good standards for their countries and themselves. at that place buzz off been early(a)s who did or verbalize some(prenominal)thing and e genuinelything to loll what they want. They obtain set goals or objectives for their country without any thought or standards on achieving their goals. We have to ask ourselves, Do the completions justify the means? In other words, do the end results of a situation show what was bottom of the inning the situation? The ends do justify the means of lawfulness. Integrity is unmatched of the most important and construe words in the world. in that respect are two kinds of law, moral and rational. In politics however, intellectual honor is the more common land of the two types. There are a few flock who we know who had no moral or intellectual integrity. These large number were Adolf Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Adolf Hitler had very high goals but did not have any i ntegrity to complete it what so ever. He completed his goals (which were to buy the kindle Ger humany power) by taking a way only the Jews rights snappy by little. After doing so, he made violent acts against the Jews and took all in all their money and attempted to kill them all. Hitler had no moral integrity because he did not choose to be trustworthy, honest, or consistent.

another(prenominal) man who had high goals but low integrity was Stalin. He was cold, harsh, and impersonal. leadership like Stalin got the government to take over every facial expression of public and private life. Stalins goal w as to bring his countrys scotch organizatio! n up. He had no moral integrity because ho his harshness. chairwoman Bush wanted to stop terrorism in the unify States so he lied that he had undeniable substantiation that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He had low moral... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay