Indiana Seat Belt Law

I disagree with the indium asshole pat honor for four major reasons. The first is it is too inconsistent and seems to spend exceptions for any reason. The second reasons is that a ships officer doesnt have to cash advance up probable cause and they dont have to show viciousness with come to the fore a shadow of a mistrust to convict you. Third, I feel it takes away person freedoms. It in any case is inconsistent with other(a) Indiana faithfulnesss, I.E. the lack of a legal philosophy regarding mounting helmets on a repelcycle in the conjure up of Indiana. The Indiana merchantman belt law states that anyone riding in a motor vehicle must damp a gumshoe belt. The law was designed to save lives, which I admit it does, on the nose it also bewilders exceptions to all sorts of vehicles and people. For instance wherefore should someone in a Taxi Cab not have to wear a seatbelt? Or why should a police officer that is apprenticed to uphold the law n ot have to wear a seatbelt? Or even better yet why should the officials who created this law not have to wear a seatbelt? The seat belt law gives exceptions to school buses, these buses are full of children the similar children these laws where puzzle in to effect to protect.

Not only does it give exceptions to them but they also give exceptions to rental cars, ambulances, out of state vehicles, general buses, youth groups, postal workers, paperboys, antique motor vehicles, and transports. or so of these exceptions whitethorn be legitimate but the thing that upsets me well-nigh virtually the law is tha t is you own a Van, Suv, or a seat Wagon, y! ou can go to the bureau of motor vehicles sacrifice octad dollars, and you can get your vehicle registered as a truck and not have to comply with the seatbelt law. It makes absolutely no reason to me to allow the same kind vehicle to be registered differently... If you wishing to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay